Search this site
Embedded Files
Skip to main content
Skip to navigation
CONSIDER
Guidelines
Civil Society Involvement in CONSIDER
CSOs
C1. Dare to take the initiative
C2. Act in line with your mission, priorities and reputation
C3. Be clear about your resources and be ready to raise funds
C4. Grow your research skills
C5. Raise your visibility
Defining common goals
Evaluators and Reviewers
E1. Emphasise the public relevance of the project
E2. Review the appropriateness of the proposed cooperation structures and resources
E3. Take into account the dissemination potential
E4. Consider how the project results can be assessed in a participatory way
Funders
F1. Clarify the purpose of funding CSO participation
F1. Raise awareness of the issues to consider in CSO engagement
F2. Allow CSOs to help shape the research agenda
F3. Create funding structures that are sensitive to CSO needs
F4. Facilitate building connections between CSOs and researchers
F5. Emphasise the importance of dissemination and impact
F6. Celebrate positive research outcomes involving CSOs
F7. Ensure sensitivity to CSO-related issues during evaluation
F7. Judge the success of CSO engagement separately
F8. Launch open calls for CSO-driven research
Glossary
Civil Society Organisation (CSO)
Innovation
Public interest
Public involvement in research
Research
Responsible Research and Innovation
How can CSOs select research partners
How can the guidelines feed into the European Research Area?
Is there really a difference between the identified stakeholder groups?
Links and Resources
Policymakers
P1. Clarify objectives when encouraging CSO participation
P2. Create an environment conducive to CSO participation in research
P3. Rethink scientific excellence
P4. Simplify processes
P5. Recognise the diverse nature of CSOs
P6. Foster collaboration over competition
Researchers
R1: Clarify your reasons for CSO involvement
R2. Be aware of your local institutional support and recognition
R3. Set your clocks: clarify likely timescales in advance
R4. Agree on project management principles
Risks and challenges to CSO participation
Selecting CSO partners
Types of CSO involvement
G1 Peripheral-marginal: Ensure that CSOs have advantages from the project
G2 Peripheral-dominant: Establish intermediates to manage mutual expectations at stake
G3 Cooperative-restrictive: Ensure that the CSOs’ tasks reflect their skills and competencies
G4 Cooperative-inclusive: Work towards mutual learning experiences
G5 Community-related: Allow the CSOs to embed the project in their typical social environment
G6 Community-based: Create a protected area of actions for researchers
What is the current state of CSO involvement in EU-funded research?
Where do these guidelines come from?
Why include CSOs in research
Activities
WP1 CSO Participation in Research Governance
WP2 The practice of CSO participation
WP3 Model of CSO participation
WP4 Guidelines for CSO participation in research
WP5 Dissemination and Awareness Raising
WP6 Project Management
CONSIDER Consortium
CONSIDER files
Contact
Deliverables
Dissemination
Travel bursary application form
Workshops
Home
News
Brussels Expert Workshop report
CONSIDER final event: workshop with the EESC on 28 January 2015
CONSIDER talk for the 5th INCO Conference in Athens, Greece.
General Assembly meeting 26/27 March 2014
Next CONSIDER workshop, 1st of July 2014, Brussels.
Videos
Workshops
1. Bonn (05/2012)
2. Porto (06/2012)
3. Copenhagen (10/2012)
4. Prague (03/2013)
5. Lille (09/2013)
6. Lille (12/2013)
7. Copenhagen (04/2014)
8. Brussels (07/2014)
CONSIDER
Guidelines
Civil Society Involvement in CONSIDER
CSOs
C1. Dare to take the initiative
C2. Act in line with your mission, priorities and reputation
C3. Be clear about your resources and be ready to raise funds
C4. Grow your research skills
C5. Raise your visibility
Defining common goals
Evaluators and Reviewers
E1. Emphasise the public relevance of the project
E2. Review the appropriateness of the proposed cooperation structures and resources
E3. Take into account the dissemination potential
E4. Consider how the project results can be assessed in a participatory way
Funders
F1. Clarify the purpose of funding CSO participation
F1. Raise awareness of the issues to consider in CSO engagement
F2. Allow CSOs to help shape the research agenda
F3. Create funding structures that are sensitive to CSO needs
F4. Facilitate building connections between CSOs and researchers
F5. Emphasise the importance of dissemination and impact
F6. Celebrate positive research outcomes involving CSOs
F7. Ensure sensitivity to CSO-related issues during evaluation
F7. Judge the success of CSO engagement separately
F8. Launch open calls for CSO-driven research
Glossary
Civil Society Organisation (CSO)
Innovation
Public interest
Public involvement in research
Research
Responsible Research and Innovation
How can CSOs select research partners
How can the guidelines feed into the European Research Area?
Is there really a difference between the identified stakeholder groups?
Links and Resources
Policymakers
P1. Clarify objectives when encouraging CSO participation
P2. Create an environment conducive to CSO participation in research
P3. Rethink scientific excellence
P4. Simplify processes
P5. Recognise the diverse nature of CSOs
P6. Foster collaboration over competition
Researchers
R1: Clarify your reasons for CSO involvement
R2. Be aware of your local institutional support and recognition
R3. Set your clocks: clarify likely timescales in advance
R4. Agree on project management principles
Risks and challenges to CSO participation
Selecting CSO partners
Types of CSO involvement
G1 Peripheral-marginal: Ensure that CSOs have advantages from the project
G2 Peripheral-dominant: Establish intermediates to manage mutual expectations at stake
G3 Cooperative-restrictive: Ensure that the CSOs’ tasks reflect their skills and competencies
G4 Cooperative-inclusive: Work towards mutual learning experiences
G5 Community-related: Allow the CSOs to embed the project in their typical social environment
G6 Community-based: Create a protected area of actions for researchers
What is the current state of CSO involvement in EU-funded research?
Where do these guidelines come from?
Why include CSOs in research
Activities
WP1 CSO Participation in Research Governance
WP2 The practice of CSO participation
WP3 Model of CSO participation
WP4 Guidelines for CSO participation in research
WP5 Dissemination and Awareness Raising
WP6 Project Management
CONSIDER Consortium
CONSIDER files
Contact
Deliverables
Dissemination
Travel bursary application form
Workshops
Home
News
Brussels Expert Workshop report
CONSIDER final event: workshop with the EESC on 28 January 2015
CONSIDER talk for the 5th INCO Conference in Athens, Greece.
General Assembly meeting 26/27 March 2014
Next CONSIDER workshop, 1st of July 2014, Brussels.
Videos
Workshops
1. Bonn (05/2012)
2. Porto (06/2012)
3. Copenhagen (10/2012)
4. Prague (03/2013)
5. Lille (09/2013)
6. Lille (12/2013)
7. Copenhagen (04/2014)
8. Brussels (07/2014)
More
Guidelines
Civil Society Involvement in CONSIDER
CSOs
C1. Dare to take the initiative
C2. Act in line with your mission, priorities and reputation
C3. Be clear about your resources and be ready to raise funds
C4. Grow your research skills
C5. Raise your visibility
Defining common goals
Evaluators and Reviewers
E1. Emphasise the public relevance of the project
E2. Review the appropriateness of the proposed cooperation structures and resources
E3. Take into account the dissemination potential
E4. Consider how the project results can be assessed in a participatory way
Funders
F1. Clarify the purpose of funding CSO participation
F1. Raise awareness of the issues to consider in CSO engagement
F2. Allow CSOs to help shape the research agenda
F3. Create funding structures that are sensitive to CSO needs
F4. Facilitate building connections between CSOs and researchers
F5. Emphasise the importance of dissemination and impact
F6. Celebrate positive research outcomes involving CSOs
F7. Ensure sensitivity to CSO-related issues during evaluation
F7. Judge the success of CSO engagement separately
F8. Launch open calls for CSO-driven research
Glossary
Civil Society Organisation (CSO)
Innovation
Public interest
Public involvement in research
Research
Responsible Research and Innovation
How can CSOs select research partners
How can the guidelines feed into the European Research Area?
Is there really a difference between the identified stakeholder groups?
Links and Resources
Policymakers
P1. Clarify objectives when encouraging CSO participation
P2. Create an environment conducive to CSO participation in research
P3. Rethink scientific excellence
P4. Simplify processes
P5. Recognise the diverse nature of CSOs
P6. Foster collaboration over competition
Researchers
R1: Clarify your reasons for CSO involvement
R2. Be aware of your local institutional support and recognition
R3. Set your clocks: clarify likely timescales in advance
R4. Agree on project management principles
Risks and challenges to CSO participation
Selecting CSO partners
Types of CSO involvement
G1 Peripheral-marginal: Ensure that CSOs have advantages from the project
G2 Peripheral-dominant: Establish intermediates to manage mutual expectations at stake
G3 Cooperative-restrictive: Ensure that the CSOs’ tasks reflect their skills and competencies
G4 Cooperative-inclusive: Work towards mutual learning experiences
G5 Community-related: Allow the CSOs to embed the project in their typical social environment
G6 Community-based: Create a protected area of actions for researchers
What is the current state of CSO involvement in EU-funded research?
Where do these guidelines come from?
Why include CSOs in research
Activities
WP1 CSO Participation in Research Governance
WP2 The practice of CSO participation
WP3 Model of CSO participation
WP4 Guidelines for CSO participation in research
WP5 Dissemination and Awareness Raising
WP6 Project Management
CONSIDER Consortium
CONSIDER files
Contact
Deliverables
Dissemination
Travel bursary application form
Workshops
Home
News
Brussels Expert Workshop report
CONSIDER final event: workshop with the EESC on 28 January 2015
CONSIDER talk for the 5th INCO Conference in Athens, Greece.
General Assembly meeting 26/27 March 2014
Next CONSIDER workshop, 1st of July 2014, Brussels.
Videos
Workshops
1. Bonn (05/2012)
2. Porto (06/2012)
3. Copenhagen (10/2012)
4. Prague (03/2013)
5. Lille (09/2013)
6. Lille (12/2013)
7. Copenhagen (04/2014)
8. Brussels (07/2014)
E4. Consider how the project results can be assessed in a participatory way
text
Guiding Questions
text
Example: <<specific title>>
text
"insert quotes here"
Google Sites
Report abuse
Page details
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse