Search this site
CONSIDER
  • Guidelines
    • Civil Society Involvement in CONSIDER
    • CSOs
      • C1. Dare to take the initiative
      • C2. Act in line with your mission, priorities and reputation
      • C3. Be clear about your resources and be ready to raise funds
      • C4. Grow your research skills
      • C5. Raise your visibility
    • Defining common goals
    • Evaluators and Reviewers
      • E1. Emphasise the public relevance of the project
      • E2. Review the appropriateness of the proposed cooperation structures and resources
      • E3. Take into account the dissemination potential
      • E4. Consider how the project results can be assessed in a participatory way
    • Funders
      • F1. Clarify the purpose of funding CSO participation
      • F1. Raise awareness of the issues to consider in CSO engagement
      • F2. Allow CSOs to help shape the research agenda
      • F3. Create funding structures that are sensitive to CSO needs
      • F4. Facilitate building connections between CSOs and researchers
      • F5. Emphasise the importance of dissemination and impact
      • F6. Celebrate positive research outcomes involving CSOs
      • F7. Ensure sensitivity to CSO-related issues during evaluation
      • F7. Judge the success of CSO engagement separately
      • F8. Launch open calls for CSO-driven research
    • Glossary
      • Civil Society Organisation (CSO)
      • Innovation
      • Public interest
      • Public involvement in research
      • Research
      • Responsible Research and Innovation
    • How can CSOs select research partners
    • How can the guidelines feed into the European Research Area?
    • Is there really a difference between the identified stakeholder groups?
    • Links and Resources
    • Policymakers
      • P1. Clarify objectives when encouraging CSO participation
      • P2. Create an environment conducive to CSO participation in research
      • P3. Rethink scientific excellence
      • P4. Simplify processes
      • P5. Recognise the diverse nature of CSOs
      • P6. Foster collaboration over competition
    • Researchers
      • R1: Clarify your reasons for CSO involvement
      • R2. Be aware of your local institutional support and recognition
      • R3. Set your clocks: clarify likely timescales in advance
      • R4. Agree on project management principles
    • Risks and challenges to CSO participation
    • Selecting CSO partners
    • Types of CSO involvement
      • G1 Peripheral-marginal: Ensure that CSOs have advantages from the project
      • G2 Peripheral-dominant: Establish intermediates to manage mutual expectations at stake
      • G3 Cooperative-restrictive: Ensure that the CSOs’ tasks reflect their skills and competencies
      • G4 Cooperative-inclusive: Work towards mutual learning experiences
      • G5 Community-related: Allow the CSOs to embed the project in their typical social environment
      • G6 Community-based: Create a protected area of actions for researchers
    • What is the current state of CSO involvement in EU-funded research?
    • Where do these guidelines come from?
    • Why include CSOs in research
  • Activities
    • WP1 CSO Participation in Research Governance
    • WP2 The practice of CSO participation
    • WP3 Model of CSO participation
    • WP4 Guidelines for CSO participation in research
    • WP5 Dissemination and Awareness Raising
    • WP6 Project Management
  • CONSIDER Consortium
  • CONSIDER files
  • Contact
  • Deliverables
  • Dissemination
    • Travel bursary application form
    • Workshops
  • Home
  • News
    • Brussels Expert Workshop report
    • CONSIDER final event: workshop with the EESC on 28 January 2015
    • CONSIDER talk for the 5th INCO Conference in Athens, Greece.
    • General Assembly meeting 26/27 March 2014
    • Next CONSIDER workshop, 1st of July 2014, Brussels.
  • Videos
  • Workshops
    • 1. Bonn (05/2012)
    • 2. Porto (06/2012)
    • 3. Copenhagen (10/2012)
    • 4. Prague (03/2013)
    • 5. Lille (09/2013)
    • 6. Lille (12/2013)
    • 7. Copenhagen (04/2014)
    • 8. Brussels (07/2014)
CONSIDER
  • Guidelines
    • Civil Society Involvement in CONSIDER
    • CSOs
      • C1. Dare to take the initiative
      • C2. Act in line with your mission, priorities and reputation
      • C3. Be clear about your resources and be ready to raise funds
      • C4. Grow your research skills
      • C5. Raise your visibility
    • Defining common goals
    • Evaluators and Reviewers
      • E1. Emphasise the public relevance of the project
      • E2. Review the appropriateness of the proposed cooperation structures and resources
      • E3. Take into account the dissemination potential
      • E4. Consider how the project results can be assessed in a participatory way
    • Funders
      • F1. Clarify the purpose of funding CSO participation
      • F1. Raise awareness of the issues to consider in CSO engagement
      • F2. Allow CSOs to help shape the research agenda
      • F3. Create funding structures that are sensitive to CSO needs
      • F4. Facilitate building connections between CSOs and researchers
      • F5. Emphasise the importance of dissemination and impact
      • F6. Celebrate positive research outcomes involving CSOs
      • F7. Ensure sensitivity to CSO-related issues during evaluation
      • F7. Judge the success of CSO engagement separately
      • F8. Launch open calls for CSO-driven research
    • Glossary
      • Civil Society Organisation (CSO)
      • Innovation
      • Public interest
      • Public involvement in research
      • Research
      • Responsible Research and Innovation
    • How can CSOs select research partners
    • How can the guidelines feed into the European Research Area?
    • Is there really a difference between the identified stakeholder groups?
    • Links and Resources
    • Policymakers
      • P1. Clarify objectives when encouraging CSO participation
      • P2. Create an environment conducive to CSO participation in research
      • P3. Rethink scientific excellence
      • P4. Simplify processes
      • P5. Recognise the diverse nature of CSOs
      • P6. Foster collaboration over competition
    • Researchers
      • R1: Clarify your reasons for CSO involvement
      • R2. Be aware of your local institutional support and recognition
      • R3. Set your clocks: clarify likely timescales in advance
      • R4. Agree on project management principles
    • Risks and challenges to CSO participation
    • Selecting CSO partners
    • Types of CSO involvement
      • G1 Peripheral-marginal: Ensure that CSOs have advantages from the project
      • G2 Peripheral-dominant: Establish intermediates to manage mutual expectations at stake
      • G3 Cooperative-restrictive: Ensure that the CSOs’ tasks reflect their skills and competencies
      • G4 Cooperative-inclusive: Work towards mutual learning experiences
      • G5 Community-related: Allow the CSOs to embed the project in their typical social environment
      • G6 Community-based: Create a protected area of actions for researchers
    • What is the current state of CSO involvement in EU-funded research?
    • Where do these guidelines come from?
    • Why include CSOs in research
  • Activities
    • WP1 CSO Participation in Research Governance
    • WP2 The practice of CSO participation
    • WP3 Model of CSO participation
    • WP4 Guidelines for CSO participation in research
    • WP5 Dissemination and Awareness Raising
    • WP6 Project Management
  • CONSIDER Consortium
  • CONSIDER files
  • Contact
  • Deliverables
  • Dissemination
    • Travel bursary application form
    • Workshops
  • Home
  • News
    • Brussels Expert Workshop report
    • CONSIDER final event: workshop with the EESC on 28 January 2015
    • CONSIDER talk for the 5th INCO Conference in Athens, Greece.
    • General Assembly meeting 26/27 March 2014
    • Next CONSIDER workshop, 1st of July 2014, Brussels.
  • Videos
  • Workshops
    • 1. Bonn (05/2012)
    • 2. Porto (06/2012)
    • 3. Copenhagen (10/2012)
    • 4. Prague (03/2013)
    • 5. Lille (09/2013)
    • 6. Lille (12/2013)
    • 7. Copenhagen (04/2014)
    • 8. Brussels (07/2014)
  • More
    • Guidelines
      • Civil Society Involvement in CONSIDER
      • CSOs
        • C1. Dare to take the initiative
        • C2. Act in line with your mission, priorities and reputation
        • C3. Be clear about your resources and be ready to raise funds
        • C4. Grow your research skills
        • C5. Raise your visibility
      • Defining common goals
      • Evaluators and Reviewers
        • E1. Emphasise the public relevance of the project
        • E2. Review the appropriateness of the proposed cooperation structures and resources
        • E3. Take into account the dissemination potential
        • E4. Consider how the project results can be assessed in a participatory way
      • Funders
        • F1. Clarify the purpose of funding CSO participation
        • F1. Raise awareness of the issues to consider in CSO engagement
        • F2. Allow CSOs to help shape the research agenda
        • F3. Create funding structures that are sensitive to CSO needs
        • F4. Facilitate building connections between CSOs and researchers
        • F5. Emphasise the importance of dissemination and impact
        • F6. Celebrate positive research outcomes involving CSOs
        • F7. Ensure sensitivity to CSO-related issues during evaluation
        • F7. Judge the success of CSO engagement separately
        • F8. Launch open calls for CSO-driven research
      • Glossary
        • Civil Society Organisation (CSO)
        • Innovation
        • Public interest
        • Public involvement in research
        • Research
        • Responsible Research and Innovation
      • How can CSOs select research partners
      • How can the guidelines feed into the European Research Area?
      • Is there really a difference between the identified stakeholder groups?
      • Links and Resources
      • Policymakers
        • P1. Clarify objectives when encouraging CSO participation
        • P2. Create an environment conducive to CSO participation in research
        • P3. Rethink scientific excellence
        • P4. Simplify processes
        • P5. Recognise the diverse nature of CSOs
        • P6. Foster collaboration over competition
      • Researchers
        • R1: Clarify your reasons for CSO involvement
        • R2. Be aware of your local institutional support and recognition
        • R3. Set your clocks: clarify likely timescales in advance
        • R4. Agree on project management principles
      • Risks and challenges to CSO participation
      • Selecting CSO partners
      • Types of CSO involvement
        • G1 Peripheral-marginal: Ensure that CSOs have advantages from the project
        • G2 Peripheral-dominant: Establish intermediates to manage mutual expectations at stake
        • G3 Cooperative-restrictive: Ensure that the CSOs’ tasks reflect their skills and competencies
        • G4 Cooperative-inclusive: Work towards mutual learning experiences
        • G5 Community-related: Allow the CSOs to embed the project in their typical social environment
        • G6 Community-based: Create a protected area of actions for researchers
      • What is the current state of CSO involvement in EU-funded research?
      • Where do these guidelines come from?
      • Why include CSOs in research
    • Activities
      • WP1 CSO Participation in Research Governance
      • WP2 The practice of CSO participation
      • WP3 Model of CSO participation
      • WP4 Guidelines for CSO participation in research
      • WP5 Dissemination and Awareness Raising
      • WP6 Project Management
    • CONSIDER Consortium
    • CONSIDER files
    • Contact
    • Deliverables
    • Dissemination
      • Travel bursary application form
      • Workshops
    • Home
    • News
      • Brussels Expert Workshop report
      • CONSIDER final event: workshop with the EESC on 28 January 2015
      • CONSIDER talk for the 5th INCO Conference in Athens, Greece.
      • General Assembly meeting 26/27 March 2014
      • Next CONSIDER workshop, 1st of July 2014, Brussels.
    • Videos
    • Workshops
      • 1. Bonn (05/2012)
      • 2. Porto (06/2012)
      • 3. Copenhagen (10/2012)
      • 4. Prague (03/2013)
      • 5. Lille (09/2013)
      • 6. Lille (12/2013)
      • 7. Copenhagen (04/2014)
      • 8. Brussels (07/2014)

News

CONSIDER final event: workshop with the EESC on 28 January 2015 - Dec 02, 2014 10:38:29 AM

Brussels Expert Workshop report - Oct 12, 2014 7:24:55 PM

Next CONSIDER workshop, 1st of July 2014, Brussels. - Jun 27, 2014 5:54:40 PM

CONSIDER talk for the 5th INCO Conference in Athens, Greece. - May 29, 2014 5:25:14 PM

General Assembly meeting 26/27 March 2014 - Mar 27, 2014 12:22:11 PM

Report abuse
Page details
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse